Geeks + Guns Keep up on the newest, geekiest weaponry in the planetary arsenals!
Promote peace through superior firepower!
Have we mentioned that this isn't your fathers' 2nd Amendment Website?
Something Completely Different
|
 Ruger has a new sweepstakes and you’re sure to love the prizes. After all, who doen’t love guns, especially FREE guns, and we could all use more guns!
Top prize is 1 Ruger SRC9 9mm, 1 Ruger LCR .38 DA revolver, 1 Ruger LCP .380 pistol plus a range bag with extra pistol magazines…
Yeah, they had me at free guns…
There are also three runner up prizes offered, so if you don’t get the grand prize you still win one free American made gun!
These are Rugers are relatively new production firearms built with concealed carry in mind.
Small, lightweight, and compact in medium range calibers, perfect for discreet carry.-[source]
 Rabidly anti-gun Congressman Mike Quigley (IL-5) will be holding a public hearing on a bill he has co-sponsored that would put gun shows under the supervision of the federal government.
The bill, pilule HR 2324, there would subject gun show hosts to a slew of pointless, time consuming regulations in addition to heaping all sorts of red tape and record keeping requirements on gun show hosts and participants.
The ultimate goal of Quigley’s bill is to make hosting a gun show too much of a hassle to endure. As a result, this bill would quickly make gun shows disappear all together.
It should be noted that Congressman Mark Kirk (IL-10) is another co-sponsor of this slap to the face of the 2nd Amendment.-[source]
According to The Korea Times, information pills the Obama administration has blocked efforts by the South Korean government to sell over a hundred thousand surplus M1 Garand and M1 Carbine rifles into the United States market. These self-loading were rifles introduced in 1926 and 1941.
As rifles, symptoms they are especially well-suited to community defense in an emergency, as in the cases of community defense following Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and Hurricane Andrew in 1992. Along with AR-15 type rifles, the M1 rifles are the quintessential firearms of responsible citizenship, precisely the type of firearms which civic responsibility organizations such as the Appleseed Project teach people how to use.-[source]
The U.S. army has enjoyed a long and incendiary relationship with TNT, visit web but the explosive that has provided the pop in everything from artillery shells to demolition munitions could be on its way out. The Army has approved a safer, more stable alternative to replace the TNT in 155-millimeter artillery shells, and engineers at Picatinny Arsenal where it was tested say it could completely replace TNT in Army and Marine munitions within a decade. - [source]
President Obama has recently dropped his cagey and coy dissembling about his true “gun control” plans. In July of this year he once again made it completely clear that he was in favor of a renewed “assault weapon” ban.
Obama is no longer laying low on the issue. We also know where Obama’s socialist Supreme Court appointees Sotomayer (who voted against the McDonald decision), approved and almost certainly Kagan, viagra 40mg stand on citizens owning firearms. Kagan is just another Sotomayer when it comes to 2A. Like Sotomayer, she waffled and said all the right things to gain her confirmation by the Senate. Do you really think Kagan would have voted in favor of Heller or McDonald?
No, who can now seriously doubt that Obama, and those who he’s appointed, are not deeply ingrained enemies of the Second Amendment?
Why this recent renewal of Obama’s true agenda? Up until now Obama knew that he did not have the votes in Congress to pass anti-gun legislation. “Gun control” is, at this time, a political non-starter. So he temporarily put on his sheep’s clothing and played the “moderate” on gun rights. This has well suited his actual wider purpose.
With an anticipated lame-duck session of Congress after the November elections, Obama’s strategy is certain to surface. In many ways it will be a “now or never” opportunity for him. It will also be a last gasp chance at bitter revenge from liberal anti-gun politicians who will have been rejected by an angry November electorate.-[source]
AB 1810 RIFLE AND SHOTGUN REGISTRATION
AB 1810 SUMMARY: Applies the same regulations relating to the reporting and retention of records for handguns to long guns, ampoule as specified. Specifically, purchase this bill conforms reporting and record retention provisions in order that transfers and information reporting and retention requirements for handguns and firearms other than handguns are the same.
AB 1810 requires registration of rifles and shotguns in the same way handguns are now registered in California. Under current law, the information collected at the time of purchase of a rifle or shotgun (serial number, make, and model) is destroyed after the background check is completed. AB 1810 will require that the make, model, and serial number of the firearm, as well as the identifying information of the purchaser, be recorded and kept on file by the California Attorney General’s office. AB 1810 will also impose additional costs on firearms owners to maintain the registration system as well as on the state’s licensed firearms dealers and small businesses who already deal with extensive recordkeeping requirements
Assembly Member Feuer, the author of AB 1810, claims that the registration of rifles and shotguns will help law enforcement track down criminals and persons prohibited from owning firearms. This logic is flawed. Studies have shown that violent criminals steal firearms to commit crimes and of course they do not comply with current law by registering their stolen handguns.
It is already against the law to possess a stolen firearm or to possess any firearm if you are prohibited from possessing a firearm by law. And most criminals file off the serial numbers on guns used in crimes. In truth, the only persons impacted by this unnecessary proposed law are law abiding citizens.-[source]
 The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) today filed a lawsuit in federal court against the City of Chicago’s new gun ordinance, cialis 40mg asserting that “by banning gun ranges open to the public…under color of law, help ” the city is depriving citizens of their right to keep and bear arms in violation of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Joining SAF in this lawsuit are the Illinois State Rifle Association (ISRA), Action Target, Inc., and three individual plaintiffs including a retired Chicago police detective. They are represented by attorneys Alan Gura of Virginia and David Sigale of Chicago, who teamed up with SAF and ISRA on the landmark case of McDonald v. City of Chicago, which incorporated the Second Amendment to the states, effectively striking down Chicago’s 28-year-old handgun ban.
“While the city has adopted new regulations that make it legal to own handguns,” said SAF Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb, “they have crafted this new ordinance to make it virtually impossible for prospective gun owners to meet all legal requirements unless they travel outside the city for mandatory training. The new ordinance prohibits public gun ranges inside the city yet the city demands that handgun owners get at least one hour of range training time.
“This is a ‘Catch-22’ scenario,” he continued, “that seems deliberately designed to discourage Chicago residents from exercising their firearm civil rights barely two months after those rights were restored by the Supreme Court.”-[source]
The Harry Reid campaign has released a campaign ad attacking Sharon Angle as “crazy” for warning that “If this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking towards those Second Amendment remedies.”
The spokesman is Bill Ames, president of the Peace Officers Research Association of Nevada and a self-described “member of the NRA and a Republican.” Says Ames:
“What she’s actually talking about is armed resistance….That kind of talk is dangerous and way too extreme.”-[source]
 Freedom is not free; however, pharm the natural right of self-defense was given to us by God and will not be stolen from us with legislation.
If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, health the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege.
~ Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
The danger has passed, but the “Arizona Fugitives” scare yesterday in Gentry, Arkansas underscores the human need for instant self-defense at all times. The American right to bear arms in this country should always be free, and never taxed (as it is in Arkansas). -[ source]
The coming generation of lasers can do some amazing things; like create matter?
When a high-powered laser fires, causing photons to impact electrons at a tremendous velocity, it is possible for matter — a positron-electron pair — to be created by the impact, as was demonstrated in a Stanford experiment in 1997. When such matter is created with a sufficiently high energy, it in turn can emit photons that move fast enough that they create their own matter. This cascade effect can have as much energy as the laser itself does, and result in the destruction of the laser. – [source]
But, what we geeks like even better is a hand-held laser which not only looks like a Lightsaber, but also which could cause skin to be set ablaze and cause permanent eye damage (from up to a mile away)!
The Hong Kong-based company bills the new device as “the most dangerous laser ever created.” The laser is accordingly raising eyebrows in the blogosphere and in safety circles alike.
“There really is no need for an individual private citizen to use [this laser] because it is way too powerful and unsafe,” said Gus Anibarro, education director of the Laser Institute of America in Orlando, Florida.
Called the Spyder III Pro Arctic, its beam is 4,000 percent brighter than Wicked Lasers’ next most-intense laser, the $2000 Sonar II Burner, yet the new device costs only $200.
The Arctic is listed as Class 4, or the most dangerous class of laser. It is derived from a home theater projector and packs a full watt (W) into its sleek confines. “That’s an awful lot of power,” said Anibarro, and he noted that this laser “could injure someone a mile away.” – [source]
|
|
Loading ...
.Com Chatter