Geeks + Guns Keep up on the newest, geekiest weaponry in the planetary arsenals!
Promote peace through superior firepower!
Have we mentioned that this isn't your fathers' 2nd Amendment Website?
Something Completely Different
|
 Come meet national gun rights leaders and your fellow grassroots activists at the 25th Annual Gun Rights Policy Conference (GRPC 2010) in San Francisco, CA, September 24, 25, & 26, 2010. This is your once-a-year chance to network and get an insider look and plan pro-gun rights strategies for the coming year.
Past GRPCs have outlined victory plans and made public the latest firearms trends. They allow you a first-hand chance to hear movement leaders–and make your voice heard.
This year we’ll take a look at critical issues such as: city gun bans, youth violence, “smart” guns, concealed carry, federal legislation, legal actions, gun show regulation, state and local activity. We’ll also preview the upcoming court cases and revisit the U.S. Supreme Court Heller Decision.
The full roster of GRPC 2010 speakers has not yet been set. Past speakers include: Alan M. Gottlieb, Joseph P. Tartaro, U.S. Representatives Ron Paul, Chris Cannon, Bob Barr & Jean Schmidt, Robert Levy, Esq. & Alan Gura, Esq., counsel for the Heller case, Wayne LaPierre, John Lott, G. Gordon Liddy, Michael Reagan, Larry Elder, Ken Hamblin, and many others.-[source]
 By a five to four majority last week, visit web the United States Supreme Court ruled that neither a state nor a city acting under a grant of authority from the state, sickness can deny a person the right to possess a firearm as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the Constitution. Interestingly, of that slim, five-member majority, only one justice had the constitutional backbone to rule the right way for the right reason. It was not Chief Justice Roberts, and it was not Antonin Scalia, considered by many as the most conservative of the tribunal’s nine members.
Standing alone in his correct and bold interpretation of both the Second Amendment and the Fourteenth, which figured prominently in the Court’s consideration of McDonald v. City of Chicago, Illinois, is Justice Clarence Thomas. Thomas — who was savagely attacked by Democratic opponents in the Senate when the first President Bush nominated him in 1991 – solidified his reputation as the true constitutionalist on the Court.-[source]
A new Rasmussen poll showing a majority of Americans believe cities cannot ban handguns “goes along with what we have been saying, try and what the Supreme Court affirmed, salve ” the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms said today.
“The high court ruled in its 2008 Heller decision that the handgun ban in Washington, and D.C. violated the Second Amendment,” noted CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb, “and this week’s McDonald ruling incorporates the Second Amendment to the states. That effectively nullifies municipal gun bans nationwide. The court has spoken twice, and a majority of Americans concur.
“The recent Rasmussen survey also revealed,” he continued, “that only 35 percent of adults support stricter gun control, proving that gun prohibitionists are in the minority, and their influence is shrinking.”
Rasmussen conducted its survey earlier this week among 1,000 adults. The margin of error is +/- 3 percentage points. The survey also found that only 14 percent of the respondents who live with someone who owns a gun believe cities can ban handguns, while a whopping 80 percent say cities do not have that authority. Fifty-five percent of those without guns in the home also agree, Rasmussen said.
“Without a doubt,” Gottlieb said, “the gun ban movement is on the ropes. I can think of a no more fitting moment for this to happen, on the eve of the Fourth of July weekend. Our American ancestors started the Revolutionary War when the British tried to confiscate their guns in Lexington and Concord. Privately-owned guns were essential to secure our liberty.-[source]
 The same six bullets sat in the cylinder of the man’s .38 special for 35 years until he fired four of them at someone who crashed through his bedroom window Wednesday.
“I often wondered if I could pick it up and pull the trigger, capsule ” the shaken and emotional man said Thursday morning, cialis 40mg hours after he gunned down an intruder in his basement apartment.
The apparent housebreaker, more about 34-year-old Demetrious Groves, a downstate man who moved a block away from the apartment about three months ago, was taken to Provena Saint Joseph Medical Center. He died about an hour after he arrived.
The apartment’s resident, a 68-year-old man, said he was watching the news on television when he got up and went into his bedroom about 6 p.m.
Because the man has not been charged with any crime, The Herald News is not identifying him.
“When I got to the door, I heard a loud thump at my window,” said the retired electronic technician who served aboard an aircraft carrier during the Vietnam War….-[source]
Gun advocates can thank two African-American men for the significant roles they played in this week’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling that affirmed U.S. citizens’ right to own a gun for self-defense wherever they live.
Justice Clarence Thomas’ vote in favor of the ruling in McDonald vs. Chicago was steeped in the 14th Amendment and the historical treatment of blacks. The case involved a black man’s desire to own a firearm to protect himself from an enemy unlike the enemies who once openly mistreated blacks.
The case originated in Chicago, where a resident tried to follow the rules to have a gun at home. Otis McDonald, 76, is a retired maintenance engineer at the University of Chicago and an Army veteran.
He has been on the front lines as a civil rights activist and union leader, and lately has been out front in the gun-rights debate, where blacks are not normally in the lead.-[source]
On Thursday, Gun Owners of America had the important opportunity to testify concerning the Second Amendment views of Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan.
William J. Olson, counsel of record on amicus briefs for GOA in both the Heller and McDonald Supreme Court cases, testified at the hearing that Kagan has demonstrated “visceral hostility” to the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.
Moreover, Olson demonstrated that Elena Kagan’s view of rights is tied in directly to her view of Judicial Supremacy, that is, that our rights “are whatever a majority of the Supreme Court rules at a particular time in a particular case.”
But under that philosophy, Olson said, “what the Court grants, the Court may take away.”
So what’s the bottom line? “If Ms. Kagan does not know whether our inalienable rights to defend ourselves from criminals and tyrants comes from God — as the Declaration of Independence states — or from government, she cannot be trusted to protect our God-given right to self-preservation,” Olson concluded.
-[source]
Here are some of the ridiculous new rules and comments coming out of Chicago after the historic decision by the US Supreme Court to acknowledge the Bill of Right across all states.
“…as of right now you can have a number or rifles, a number of shotguns. . . What is wrong with that? If you can’t protect your home with that armament, you shouldn’t be here. You shouldn’t be here.” ~ Ald. James Balcer
*Firearm sales would be banned in the city.
*Gun training totaling four hours in a classroom and an hour on a firing range is required before getting a permit.
* But firing ranges are banned, so training would need to be completed outside Chicago.
*To transport a gun, it would have to be “broken down,” not immediately accessible, unloaded and in a firearm case.
* Firearms could be possessed only inside the dwelling. It would be illegal to have a gun in the garage, on the front porch or in the yard.
*Only one firearm per permit holder can be kept in ready-to-fire condition. Other guns must be taken apart or have trigger locks in place.
* Assault weapons are banned, as are sawed-off shotguns and “unsafe” handguns, as defined by the Chicago Police Department, which will maintain an online list of prohibited guns.
*Applicants would need a Chicago firearm permit, costing $100 every three years, as well as an Illinois firearm owner’s ID card.
* They would be required to register all their guns with the city, at a cost of $15 per gun every three years.
- [source]
 A Ted Nugent concert is 75 percent hard-charging rock ‘n’ roll and 25 percent a celebration of red-white-and-blue values.
At the heart of his message is that our freedom can be taken away if it isn’t understood and defended. All Americans should be mindful of that danger this Independence Day.
In between rock anthems such as “Cat Scratch Fever” and “Stranglehold,” Mr. Nugent hails the United States as the best country on Earth but cautions that American exceptionalism mostly exists despite the government, not because of it. When the universal rights that make America special are threatened by government overreach, defiance is the responsibility of the people, he declares. In an indictment of the out-of-control bureaucracy he calls Fedzilla, the Motor City Madman warns that one advantage America always has enjoyed is that, “the rest of the world sucks, and America has always sucked less – but we’re catching up fast.” That arrow is aimed squarely at the heart of the Obama administration and the Democrats’ power grab, to which we say, “Amen, Uncle Ted.”-[source]
There may be no vote a United States Senator casts that is more important than a vote to confirm a nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court. Now that the Court has clearly stated that the Second Amendment is a fundamental, this site individual right that applies to all law-abiding Americans, dosage NRA members and gun owners expect a nominee to the Court to fully support, defend and preserve that freedom.
We have carefully examined the career, written documents and public statements of nominee Elena Kagan and have found nothing to indicate any support for the Second Amendment. On the contrary, the facts reveal a nominee who opposes Second Amendment rights and is clearly out of step with mainstream Americans.
Therefore, the NRA is strongly opposed to Kagan’s confirmation to the Court.-[source]
 Multiple sources tell me the National Rifle Association is planning to endorse liberal Harry Reid against pro-gun champion Sharron Angle.
Two weeks ago, shop I told you about the carveout the NRA recieved in exchange for their support for the DISCLOSE ACT deal.
Then this week, medical RedState broke the story of the “gag order” the NRA issued to members of its Board on the Kagan nomination.
Now, I’m getting credible reports that the NRA is leaning toward endorsing Harry Reid, even though the NRA is finally saying it will score a vote on Kagan — something that was not a sure thing.
Why would they do this? Why would they go out of their way to protect a Senator who has demonstrated a repeated hostility to the Second Amendment in his votes and his leadership?-[source]
|
|
Loading ...
.Com Chatter