Geeks + Guns Keep up on the newest, geekiest weaponry in the planetary arsenals!
Promote peace through superior firepower!
Have we mentioned that this isn't your fathers' 2nd Amendment Website?
Something Completely Different
|
 Long Island Firearms has contributed $2, stomach 000 to the Second Amendment Foundation to support its legal actions, viagra 40mg including a lawsuit in Westchester County challenging a state law that allows carry licenses to be denied because applicants cannot show “good cause.”
This is the second such contribution from a New York group. Earlier, side effects the Shooters Committee On Political Education (SCOPE) contributed to the SAF legal action effort.
“SAF is very grateful for this level of support from Long Island Firearms,” said SAF Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “The level of support we are getting from New York gun owners clearly demonstrates their dedication to correcting the Empire State’s onerous gun laws. For far too long, officials in the Empire State have treated the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms as a highly-regulated privilege. It is time for that to end.”-[source]
 As was widely reported several weeks ago, adiposity on June 28, 2010, more about the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in the case of McDonald v. Chicago.
While the decision is long, in general, it represents a tremendous victory for individual gun rights since it applied the Second Amendment’s protections as described in District of Columbia v. Heller (which only applied federally) to states and local municipalities.
In response to McDonald, the City of Chicago recently issued new rules that set forth a so-called system to register firearms within the City. These rules were issued in record speed after the Supreme Court’s ruling against the City in a transparent attempt to avoid a ruling of the highest court in the country and to trample on the fundamental right of citizens to protect themselves with the firearms of their choosing.-[source]
 Talk about an interesting Second Amendment case. Does a blind person enjoy the
constitutional right to own firearms?
That may sound like a great law school debate, but it was real life drama this week in state Superior Court, Morristown. The issue dates back to 1994 when a judge said that Steven Hopler of Rockaway Township could own guns and shoot them under supervision notwithstanding his lack of sight. A problem arose 14 years later when Hopler shot himself in the shin. When police investigated, they found a number of loaded guns strewn around the house, including one
in an oven mitt. Police confiscated those weapons.
A short while later, Hopler’s home was burglarized and more guns were stolen, one of which was used by a man in Passaic County to commit suicide.-[source]
 WHATEVER SPIN Chicago Mayor Richard Daley and the city council wish to offer, buy it is their stubborn arrogance that has resulted in more gun rights lawsuits filed against the city following the Supreme Court’s June 28 ruling in McDonald v. City of Chicago that essentially nullified the city’s 28-year handgun ban.
The McDonald case – brought by the Second Amendment Foundation and Illinois State Rifle Association with four Chicago residents – resulted in a landmark ruling that incorporated the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms to the states via the 14th Amendment. The foundation and rifle association have now been joined by Action Target Inc., and two residents to challenge the city’s new gun ordinance, which appears to have been written to purposely provoke more lawsuits.-[source]
 An Edmonton police officer believes an overwhelming number of law enforcement officials across the country are in favour of scrapping Canada’s long-gun registry through a survey in a national police magazine.
And that’s against a latest stance by the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police — including Edmonton Police Chief Mike Boyd — who say the registry “protects lives” across the country.
“When the police chiefs across Canada say ‘we represent the police and we believe in (the registry),’ I think my survey has proved them wrong,” said Const. Randy Kuntz, a criminal investigator with the Edmonton Police Service.-[source]
Any would-be robbers looking to walk into the bank here had best think twice.
There’s a new sign in town.
About a month ago, viagra approved Chappell Hill Bank president Edward Smith looked at a sign on the front door prohibiting concealed weapons from his business and decided to make a policy change.
Licensed to carry a handgun? Come on in, and bring your weapon.
The sign, now prominently displayed on the bank’s front door, says, “Lawful concealed carry permitted on these premises. Management recognizes the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as an inalienable right of all citizens. We therefore support and encourage the carrying of licensed concealed weapons.”
Smith said he made the policy change to send a warning to potential robbers, and also to express support to Americans’ right to bear arms.-[source]
National lawmakers were in Chicago holding a Congressional hearing on proposed gun control legislation today.
The Closing the Gun Show Loophole Act would require private sellers at gun shows to perform background checks before selling firearms. Illinois passed a similar law in 2005.-[source]
AB 1934 would ban the Open Carry of unloaded handguns throughout the State of California. Although the handgun must be unloaded it is legal to carry ammunition with you and, with a little practice, have the gun loaded and aimed in less than two seconds. There are some restrictions however. It is illegal to walk along a public sidewalk or across a public street within 1,000 feet of the grounds of a K-12 public or private school. It is legal to openly carry at a business, residence or private property (so long as the private property doesn’t have a sidewalk with a public easement). Step one foot onto the public sidewalk, or any government property, and you face serious jail time.-[source]
The Second Amendment Foundation has filed an amicus curiae brief in the long-running Nordyke v. King case in California, troche arguing that Second Amendment issues must be decided on a “strict scrutiny” basis, more about and that an ordinance in Alameda County banning gun shows at the county fairgrounds is unconstitutional because it would not withstand that standard of review.
This case was a catalyst for the U.S. Supreme Court to hear SAF’s case challenging the handgun ban in Chicago, because in an earlier Nordyke ruling – subsequently set aside in favor of a full en banc hearing by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals – created a conflict in the circuits over Second Amendment incorporation.
SAF’s brief was written by attorney Alan Gura, who argued the landmark 2008 Heller case and represented SAF and its co-plaintiffs in the recent McDonald case, and is currently working with the foundation on other cases in Maryland, Illinois, New York and North Carolina.-[source]
Illegal traders advertise with graffiti on walls, despite China’s near total ban on private gun ownership. To what effect has the black market succeeded?
“In 2007, a study by the Geneva-based Graduate Institute of International Studies estimated the total number of guns held by civilians in China at 40 million, third only to the United States and India.”
The government, of course, disputes this. In truth, they don’t know. No one does.
But despite seizures and destruction of confiscated firearms, the trade continues. It’s too profitable not to, despite severe penalties for those caught in violation of Chinese citizen disarmament laws.-[source]
|
|
Loading ...
.Com Chatter