<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geeks With Guns &#187; shotgun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/tag/shotgun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com</link>
	<description>This ain&#039;t your fathers&#039; 2nd Amendment website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:15:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Political Victory For All Gun Owners</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/09/a-political-victory-for-all-gun-owners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/09/a-political-victory-for-all-gun-owners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NICS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A shining moment for California’s Gun owners who flexed their collective power and made their voices heard!</p>
<p>DEFEATED:</p>

 AB 1810(Feuer) – Registration of Rifles and Shotguns
AB 1934 (Saldana) – Handgun Open Carry Prohibition
AB 2358 (De Leon) – Ammunition Registration

<p>All three of these bills posed a fundamental threat to the rights of  gun owners. And there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3182" title="politics" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>A shining moment for California’s Gun owners who flexed their collective power and made their voices heard!</em></p>
<p><strong>DEFEATED:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> AB 1810(Feuer) – Registration of Rifles and Shotguns</li>
<li>AB 1934 (Saldana) – Handgun Open Carry Prohibition</li>
<li>AB 2358 (De Leon) – Ammunition Registration</li>
</ul>
<p>All three of these bills posed a fundamental threat to the rights of  gun owners. And there was no room for compromise any one of the bills.</p>
<p>It was a fight down to midnight, but in the late hours of August 31, AB 1810, AB 1934, and AB 2358 were DEFEATED!</p>
<p>This is a huge win for gun owners.  Thank you to all members who took  time to contact members of legislature and voice their strong  opposition to these bills.  Your collective voice was heard loud and  clear at the capitol.  You stoked the fire against AB 1810, AB 1934, and  AB 2358 and it paid off!-[<a href="http://www.ammoland.com/2010/09/01/a-political-victory-for-all-gun-owners/" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/09/a-political-victory-for-all-gun-owners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Senate Rejects Open-Carry Gun Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/california-senate-rejects-open-carry-gun-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/california-senate-rejects-open-carry-gun-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The California Senate  rejected a bill Monday that would have made it illegal to carry unloaded  guns in public, but lawmakers will give the vote one more try.</p>
<p>Monday&#8217;s 20-16 vote fell one short of the majority needed, but the Senate will reconsider the measure Tuesday.</p>
<p>The  bill, AB1934, was introduced after a series [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3182" title="politics" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>The California Senate  rejected a bill Monday that would have made it illegal to carry unloaded  guns in public, but lawmakers will give the vote one more try.</p>
<p>Monday&#8217;s 20-16 vote fell one short of the majority needed, but the Senate will reconsider the measure Tuesday.</p>
<p>The  bill, AB1934, was introduced after a series of demonstrations by  gun-rights organizations during which they encouraged participants to  openly carry unloaded weapons. California law lets gun owners carry a  rifle or handgun in a holster if it is not loaded.</p>
<p>The legislation would make it a misdemeanor to openly carry a handgun in any public place.-[<a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_15945772?nclick_check=1" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/california-senate-rejects-open-carry-gun-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movement On The U.N. Gun Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/movement-on-the-u-n-gun-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/movement-on-the-u-n-gun-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and the United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AR-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RKBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.N.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mexican President and Chicago Mayor call for end of U.S. Sovereignty.</p>
<p>A storm of liberal anti-gun opinion is swelling to force international  anti-gun policies on American citizens as NAGR continues the fight to  protect the Second Amendment from international gun grabbers.</p>
<p>Recently we reported that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama Administration are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/foreign_policy.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3169" title="foreign_policy" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/foreign_policy.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>Mexican President and Chicago Mayor call for end of U.S. Sovereignty.</em></p>
<p>A storm of liberal anti-gun opinion is swelling to force international  anti-gun policies on American citizens as NAGR continues the fight to  protect the Second Amendment from international gun grabbers.</p>
<p>Recently we reported that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama Administration are pushing for Senate ratification of the United Nations&#8217; <em>“Small Arms Treaty.” </em>The  National Association for Gun Rights has taken the lead on stopping this  end-run around the Constitution by contacting millions of Americans  about this impending threat to their liberties, and working with  principled leaders in Washington, D.C. to build a bulwark against the  treaty.-[<a href="http://www.ammoland.com/2010/08/26/un-gun-ban/" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/movement-on-the-u-n-gun-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cop Survey Backs Gun Registry Scrap</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/cop-survey-backs-gun-registry-scrap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/cop-survey-backs-gun-registry-scrap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 21:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and the United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An Edmonton police officer believes an overwhelming number of law  enforcement officials across the country are in favour of scrapping  Canada&#8217;s long-gun registry through a survey in a national police  magazine.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s against a latest stance by the Canadian Association of  Chiefs of Police &#8212; including Edmonton Police Chief Mike Boyd [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/foreign_policy.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3169" title="foreign_policy" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/foreign_policy.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>An Edmonton police officer believes an overwhelming number of law  enforcement officials across the country are in favour of scrapping  Canada&#8217;s long-gun registry through a survey in a national police  magazine.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s against a latest stance by the Canadian Association of  Chiefs of Police &#8212; including Edmonton Police Chief Mike Boyd &#8212; who  say the registry &#8220;protects lives&#8221; across the country.</p>
<p>&#8220;When the police chiefs across Canada say &#8216;we represent the  police and we believe in (the registry),&#8217; I think my survey has proved  them wrong,&#8221; said Const. Randy Kuntz, a criminal investigator with the  Edmonton Police Service.-[<a href="http://www.torontosun.com/news/canada/2010/08/21/15095571.html" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/cop-survey-backs-gun-registry-scrap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CA Ready To Ban Open Carry;Register Long Guns</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/ca-ready-to-ban-open-carryregister-long-guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/ca-ready-to-ban-open-carryregister-long-guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weaponry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concealed carry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>AB 1810 RIFLE AND SHOTGUN REGISTRATION
AB 1810 SUMMARY: Applies the same regulations relating to the reporting and retention of records for handguns to long guns, as specified. Specifically, this bill conforms reporting and record retention provisions in order that transfers and information reporting and retention requirements for handguns and firearms other than handguns are the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/weapons.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3193" title="weapons" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/weapons.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>AB 1810 RIFLE AND SHOTGUN REGISTRATION</strong><br />
AB 1810 SUMMARY: Applies the same regulations relating to the reporting and retention of records for handguns to long guns, as specified. Specifically, this bill conforms reporting and record retention provisions in order that transfers and information reporting and retention requirements for handguns and firearms other than handguns are the same.</p>
<p>AB 1810 requires registration of rifles and shotguns in the same way handguns are now registered in California. Under current law, the information collected at the time of purchase of a rifle or shotgun<em> (serial number, make, and model) </em>is destroyed after the background check is completed. AB 1810 will require that the make, model, and serial number of the firearm, as well as the identifying information of the purchaser, be recorded and kept on file by the California Attorney General’s office. AB 1810 will also impose additional costs on firearms owners to maintain the registration system as well as on the state’s licensed firearms dealers and small businesses who already deal with extensive recordkeeping requirements</p>
<p>Assembly Member Feuer, the author of AB 1810, claims that the registration of rifles and shotguns will help law enforcement track down criminals and persons prohibited from owning firearms. This logic is flawed. Studies have shown that violent criminals steal firearms to commit crimes and of course they do not comply with current law by registering their stolen handguns.</p>
<blockquote><p>It is already against the law to possess a stolen firearm or to possess any firearm if you are prohibited from possessing a firearm by law. And most criminals file off the serial numbers on guns used in crimes. In truth, the only persons impacted by this unnecessary proposed law are law abiding citizens.-[<a href="http://www.ammoland.com/2010/08/16/california-banning-open-carry-registering-all-long-guns/" target="_blank">source</a>]</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/ca-ready-to-ban-open-carryregister-long-guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Armed American Radio:Listen In</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/armed-american-radiolisten-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/armed-american-radiolisten-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 20:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community of firearm owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concealed carry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hupp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RKBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As I was sitting in the “green room” at the FOX studios in New York City  on June 23rd, 2010 John Stossel sat down beside me and asked in that  famous Stossel tone , “Armed American Radio?…So how can a radio…be  armed”?  I’m sure he took notice of the puzzled look on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3252" title="community" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>As I was sitting in the “green room” at the FOX studios in New York City  on June 23rd, 2010 John Stossel sat down beside me and asked in that  famous Stossel tone , “Armed American Radio?…So how can a radio…be  armed”?  I’m sure he took notice of the puzzled look on my face as I  instantly quipped, “The radio can’t…but the host and listeners, are”!   He smiled, and commented that he liked the quick wit and promised me  that he wouldn’t ask me anything like that on camera.  He didn’t.</p>
<p>The  Stossel show that aired later that week and which I participated on  that day was titled ‘More Guns, Less Crime’ and it was an honor to be  asked to appear on FOX Business Channel and do my part to defend our  uniquely American right to keep and bear arms in that forum.  Joining me  were freedom fighters and patriots such as author John Lott, Luby’s  massacre survivor Suzanna Hupp, David Burnett from Students for  Concealed Carry on Campus, Nikki Goeser whose husband was murdered in a  TN bar last year, and brilliant pro-gun attorney Alan Gura who won both  the Heller (DC) and McDonald (Chicago) Supreme Court gun ban cases and  all of whom have appeared as guests on Armed American Radio.-[<a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=38331" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/armed-american-radiolisten-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s That About Self-Protection, Obama?</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/whats-that-about-self-protection-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/whats-that-about-self-protection-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 02:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>During the Rodney King riots in Los Angeles in 1992, the one news  report that stuck with me was how the Korean shop owners kept their  premises safe from the marauding mobs.</p>
<p>The uprising was the reaction to the acquittal of four white  police officers accused in the beating of King after his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/usa.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3192" title="usa" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/usa.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>During the Rodney King riots in Los Angeles in 1992, the one news  report that stuck with me was how the Korean shop owners kept their  premises safe from the marauding mobs.</p>
<p>The uprising was the reaction to the acquittal of four white  police officers accused in the beating of King after his arrest a year  before.</p>
<p>When the verdict came it, all hell broke loose as out-of-control  rioters spread from the inner city toward the affluent Westside.</p>
<p>The Koreans&#8217; businesses were on the fringe of downtown and South  Central L.A. where the rioting began. Those storeowners didn&#8217;t try to  reason with the lawbreakers. They didn&#8217;t depend on alarm systems.</p>
<p>They couldn&#8217;t even rely on the police department – or the Army,  Marines and National Guard – who were having their own troubles dealing  with the street violence and massive destruction. It was all the cops  and military could do to stop the mayhem and try to prevent the  destruction and looting from spreading into Westwood, Brentwood and Bel  Air.</p>
<p><em>I recall that local news reported that residents of those  affluent areas suddenly became customers of local gun shops as they  suddenly realized they needed ways to protect themselves.</em></p>
<p><em>Funny how threats to survival make people sensible.</em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s where the Korean shop owners come in. They&#8217;d planned ahead  and had their firearms. When the roving mobs came into their area, they  just sat in front of their stores with a shotgun across their laps, and  waited.</p>
<p>The rioters, more interested in destruction than in getting  killed, avoided those businesses and moved on to easier marks. There  were a lot of those – more than 3,100 businesses looted, 7,000 fires  started and a billion dollars in losses – to say nothing of the deaths  and injuries.</p>
<p>Time magazine called it the &#8220;worst single episode of urban unrest in American history.&#8221;</p>
<p>But every armed Korean business was spared.</p>
<p>I thought of this episode as I followed the ludicrous situation facing Arizona.-[<a href="http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;pageId=186685" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/whats-that-about-self-protection-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chicago Gun Lawsuit Plaintiffs Apply For Permits</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/07/chicago-gun-lawsuit-plaintiffs-apply-for-permits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/07/chicago-gun-lawsuit-plaintiffs-apply-for-permits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community of firearm owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RKBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>Two years after filing a  lawsuit that ultimately forced the city to dismantle its 28-year-old  handgun ban, Otis McDonald walked into a police station Monday and  applied for a permit allowing him to keep a gun at home.</p>
<p>The process took only 20 minutes, but McDonald said some of the  requirements to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3252" title="community" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>Two years after filing a  lawsuit that ultimately forced the city to dismantle its 28-year-old  handgun ban, Otis McDonald walked into a police station Monday and  applied for a permit allowing him to keep a gun at home.</p>
<p>The process took only 20 minutes, but McDonald said some of the  requirements to obtain the permit seemed excessive. And though a gun  permit was worth any price for him, he said he is concerned that the  $100 fee could deter some law-abiding citizens from buying a handgun.</p>
</div>
<p>The city&#8217;s new gun ordinance,  enacted after the U.S. Supreme Court gutted the law that banned  handguns, allows each eligible gun owner in a home to buy one handgun a  month. Each handgun requires a $100 permit that must be renewed every  three years. Gun owners also are required to register all their guns  with the city, at a cost of $15 per gun every three years.-[<a href="http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2010/07/supreme-court-gun-plaintiff-files-for-permit.html" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/07/chicago-gun-lawsuit-plaintiffs-apply-for-permits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gun Sales Up After Murray Home Invasion</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/07/gun-sales-up-after-murray-home-invasion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/07/gun-sales-up-after-murray-home-invasion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opening A Can]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A July 12th home invasion left Murray  homeowner and businessman Chuck Wynn and one of his alleged assailants injured  after an exchange of gunfire. Murray police have charged two men with attempted  murder in the incident and four others in connection with the break-in. Chris  Taylor sits down with Wynn to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/whoopass.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3194" title="whoopass" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/whoopass.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>A July 12th home invasion left Murray  homeowner and businessman Chuck Wynn and one of his alleged assailants injured  after an exchange of gunfire. Murray police have charged two men with attempted  murder in the incident and four others in connection with the break-in. Chris  Taylor sits down with Wynn to talk about what happened that night and looks into  the impact something like this has on a community and its gun  sales.</em></p>
<p>The first thing Chuck Wynn remembers from the attack that  night is a rude awakening.</p>
<p>Wynn- <em>I woke up with the lights on and two  men standing there with handguns pointed at me. One of them jumped into the bed  immediately and put a gun to my forehead. The other one came over to my side of  the bed and started beating me with his pistol.</em>-[<a href="http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wkms/news.newsmain/article/1/0/1679417/Local.Features/Gun.Sales.Up.after.Murray.Home.Invasion" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/07/gun-sales-up-after-murray-home-invasion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CA:Registration For Future Confiscation</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/06/caregistration-for-future-confiscation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/06/caregistration-for-future-confiscation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weaponry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NICS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RKBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=3846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>California would keep a permanent record of anyone buying a shotgun or rifle under legislation passed Thursday by the Assembly.</p>
<p>The measure would expand state law by adding long-gun buyers to a state Justice Department database that currently can identify only handgun purchasers.</p>
<p>Opponents contend the bill is the latest in a long line of bureaucratic hurdles [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/weapons.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3193" title="weapons" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/weapons.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>California would keep a permanent record of anyone buying a shotgun or rifle under legislation passed Thursday by the Assembly.</p>
<p>The measure would expand state law by adding long-gun buyers to a state Justice Department database that currently can identify only handgun purchasers.</p>
<p>Opponents contend the bill is the latest in a long line of bureaucratic hurdles designed to discourage gun ownership.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s none of government&#8217;s flippin&#8217; business what guns I own, or why I own them,&#8221; said Sam Paredes, executive director of Gun Owners of California.-[<a href="http://www.fresnobee.com/2010/06/04/1956957/california-assembly-approves-bill.html" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/06/caregistration-for-future-confiscation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
