<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geeks With Guns &#187; Privacy Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/category/privacy-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com</link>
	<description>This ain&#039;t your fathers&#039; 2nd Amendment website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 02:23:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hi Pirate! We got you! (In our database).</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/12/hi-pirate-we-got-you-in-our-database/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/12/hi-pirate-we-got-you-in-our-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HGIC</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security and Encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bittorrent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torrents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youhavedownloaded]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=5570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The website YouHaveDownloaded.com will let you know if they have your current IP address in their Naughty List. The scary part is, that you could simply enter an IP address of another household and view the downloading habits of another. Anyone think this won't be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/privacy.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3183" title="privacy" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/privacy.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>&#8220;<em><strong>Hi Pirate IP ###.##.#.###! We got you! (In our database). You like torrents, don’t you? At least someone in your house does. It looks like you are from United States, somewhere around The Pentagon. According to our records, you have downloaded a couple of files. Below is a table with examples. You can click on any filename to get more details. Of course, we are sure that you didn’t violate any laws of United States and downloaded only legal stuff, right?</strong></em>&#8221; ~ from <a title="YouHaveDownoaded.com" href="http://www.youhavedownloaded.com/" target="_blank">youhavedownloaded.com</a></p>
<p>Think you are secure from prosecution?  Most of us share IP addressed passed around by our Internet Service provider (ISP), and the one you are using now might very well have been used by someone who uses BitTorrent technologies to pirate games, movies and music (among much else). The website YouHaveDownloaded.com will let you know if they have your current IP address in their Naughty List. The scary part is, that you could simply enter an IP address of another household and view the downloading habits of another. Anyone think this won&#8217;t be misused?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/12/hi-pirate-we-got-you-in-our-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Max Motors Targeted By ATF, Banks And GM</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/09/max-motors-targeted-by-atf-banks-and-gm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/09/max-motors-targeted-by-atf-banks-and-gm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weaponry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AK-47]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BATFE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RKBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=5554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Missouri car dealer offered AK-47&#8242;s with new car purchases</p>
<p>Despite the White House harassment, and the loss of financing and  insurance arrangements that came in the past, the Butler, Mo., car  dealer who will be giving away AK-47’s again starting in October.</p>
<p>“Guess  what? We are doing it again! It is the Fourth Annual [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/weapons.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3193" title="weapons" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/weapons.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>Missouri car dealer offered AK-47&#8242;s with new car purchases</p>
<p>Despite the White House harassment, and the loss of financing and  insurance arrangements that came in the past, the Butler, Mo., car  dealer who will be giving away AK-47’s again starting in October.</p>
<p>“Guess  what? We are doing it again! It is the Fourth Annual Great Guns and Gas  Give-Away!” said Mark Muller, the owner of Max Motors, whose July 17,  2009 interview with CNN’s Carol Costello about his promotion was great  publicity, but brought him unwelcome attention.</p>
<p>Within days of  the CNN broadcast, three agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,  Firearms and Explosives arrived at the dealership, he said.</p>
<p>“I was not there, they identified themselves and asked who was in-charge, and everybody pointed at each other,” he said.</p>
<p>Undeterred,  the agents demanded to see the guns, he said. When it was explained  that there were no actual guns, and that the promotion was really for  vouchers towards the purchase of an AK-47, the agents did not believe  it.</p>
<p>“There was an empty gun box here from a gun dealer in North  Carolina, and they took that and demanded to see the gun that came with  that box,” he said. The agents also went into storage rooms and took  photos.</p>
<p>The next day, Muller received a call from the ATF asking  him to come in for a meeting with all of his personal guns, which they  insisted they had to authority to order, he said. Muller held his ground  and refused to submit to the audit without first going through due  process.-[<a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=46443" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/09/max-motors-targeted-by-atf-banks-and-gm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Firearms Industry Files Suit Against ATF</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/08/5492/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/08/5492/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 01:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community of firearm owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4473]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BATFE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BorderPatrol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Terry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gunstores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NICS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSSF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffickers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=5492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The National Shooting Sports Foundation  (NSSF), the trade association for America&#8217;s firearms industry, today  filed a lawsuit challenging the legal authority of the Bureau of  Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) under the Gun Control  Act to compel 8,500 federally licensed firearms retailers in Arizona,  California, New Mexico and Texas [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3252" title="community" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>The National Shooting Sports Foundation  (NSSF), the trade association for America&#8217;s firearms industry, today  filed a lawsuit challenging the legal authority of the Bureau of  Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) under the Gun Control  Act to compel 8,500 federally licensed firearms retailers in Arizona,  California, New Mexico and Texas to report the sale of two or more  rifles.</p>
<p>Specifically, the regulation calls for  reporting multiple sales of any semi-automatic rifle larger than .22  caliber and capable of accepting a detachable magazine that are  purchased following an FBI background check by the same individual  within five consecutive business days.</p>
<p>NSSF&#8217;s lawsuit, filed in the U.S.  District Court for the District of Columbia, seeks an injunction to  block ATF from implementing the reporting requirement. ATF has sent  &#8220;demand letters&#8221; to firearms retailers in the four states to inform  retailers they must begin reporting such sales by August 14.</p>
<p>NSSF Senior Vice President and General  Counsel Lawrence G. Keane pointed out that if ATF can require this  record-keeping and reporting requirement of law-abiding retailers in  these four states simply by sending a letter demanding the information,  then there is no record or report ATF cannot require of any licensee,  anywhere in the country, for as long as ATF wants. &#8220;This is the  proverbial &#8216;slippery slope,&#8217; and our industry is extremely concerned  about it,&#8221; said Keane.</p>
<p>Keane added, &#8220;At the time Congress  authorized the reporting of multiple sales of handguns, it could have  required it for the sale of long guns, but it did not. Acting ATF  Director Ken Melson himself has questioned ATF&#8217;s legal authority to  impose this new requirement.&#8221;-[<a href="http://www.rightsidenews.com/2011080314208/us/homeland-security/firearms-industry-files-suit-against-atf.html" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/08/5492/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The UN Is After Your Guns</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/07/the-un-is-after-your-guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/07/the-un-is-after-your-guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 22:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community of firearm owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and the United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weaponry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civilians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collecting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confiscation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genocide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RKBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.N.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=5470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Push for Gun Control Treaty Continues</p>
<p>A UN committee wrapped up a week-long series of meetings on a massive treaty that could undermine both U.S.  sovereignty and the Second Amendment.  This is the third round of  meetings by the so-called “preparatory committee” on the Arms Trade  Treaty (ATT) as the UN gears up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/foreign_policy.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3169" title="foreign_policy" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/foreign_policy.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>Push for Gun Control Treaty Continues</strong></p>
<p>A UN committee wrapped up a week-long series of meetings on a massive treaty that could undermine both U.S.  sovereignty and the Second Amendment.  This is the third round of  meetings by the so-called “preparatory committee” on the Arms Trade  Treaty (ATT) as the UN gears up for final negotiations in 2012.</p>
<p>The most comprehensive treaty of its kind, the ATT would regulate  weapons trade throughout the world on everything from battleships to  bullets.</p>
<p>And as information trickles out of Turtle Bay in New York City, it is obvious the UN is getting more clever about taking the focus off of “small arms.”</p>
<p>With an eye cast in the direction of the U.S.—in particular, toward  the U.S. Senate which must ratify the treaty—the most recent Draft Paper  for the Arms Trade Treaty recognizes in its preamble “the sovereign  right of States to determine any regulation of internal transfers of  arms and national ownership exclusively within their territory,  including through national constitutional protections on private  ownership.”</p>
<p>That statement, taken by itself, is troubling.  Americans’ right to  keep and bear arms exists whether or not it is “recognized” by some UN  committee.  The right enshrined in the Second Amendment predates our own  Constitution, and does not need an international stamp of approval.-[<a href="http://gunowners.org/a07152011.htm" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/07/the-un-is-after-your-guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Want freedom? Leave California</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/06/want-freedom-leave-california/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/06/want-freedom-leave-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.H.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restrictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S.D.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=5369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The economy’s in the tank – unemployment has been in double digits for a couple of years.</p>
<p>The state budget has a $10.8 billion hole in it.</p>
<p>It’s June, but yesterday it was 53 degrees and raining in the Bay Area.</p>
<p>And now, just to make us feel even worse about the Golden State, here  comes a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/usa.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3192" title="usa" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/usa.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>The economy’s in the tank – unemployment has been in double digits for a couple of years.</p>
<p>The state budget has a $10.8 billion hole in it.</p>
<p>It’s June, but yesterday it was 53 degrees and raining in the Bay Area.</p>
<p>And now, just to make us feel even worse about the Golden State, here  comes a study by social scientists at the Mercatus Center at George  Mason University in Arlington, Va.</p>
<p>They say that California ranks 48th in the nation – that is, third  from dead last – for having policies and laws that adversely “affect  individual freedoms in the economic, social and personal spheres.”</p>
<p>If you want to be free, leave Lotus Land for New Hampshire or South  Dakota, say the report’s authors, professors William Ruger of Texas  State University and Jason Sorens of the University at Buffalo.-[<a href="http://californiawatch.org/dailyreport/want-freedom-leave-california-south-dakota-report-says-10661" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/06/want-freedom-leave-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CA:Dems Pass Gun Registration GOP Walks Out</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/06/cadems-pass-gun-registration-gop-walks-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/06/cadems-pass-gun-registration-gop-walks-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community of firearm owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weaponry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB809]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confiscation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NICS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RKBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=5352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This just in from Sam Paredes of Gun Owners Of California:</p>
<p>&#8220;AB 809 (Feuer&#8217;s long gun registration bill) just passed  out of the Assembly on a vote of 44-2 w/ no Republicans voting at all.  Reps walked off the floor when the Speaker wouldn&#8217;t grant them the  courtesy of a 15 min caucus. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/weapons.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3193" title="weapons" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/weapons.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>This just in from Sam Paredes of Gun Owners Of California<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.gunownersca.com/index.php"></a>:</p>
<p><em><strong>&#8220;AB 809 (Feuer&#8217;s long gun registration bill) just passed  out of the Assembly on a vote of 44-2 w/ no Republicans voting at all.  Reps walked off the floor when the Speaker wouldn&#8217;t grant them the  courtesy of a 15 min caucus. Such pettiness by the Speaker is previously  unheard of -Republican protest is completely justified! &#8211; Sam P.  reporting from the Capitol&#8221;</strong></em></p>
<p>AB 809 would create a Canadian style registration scheme for long  guns. A failed system which has cost the Canadians nearly one Billion  dollars.-[<a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-in-los-angeles/assembly-democrats-pass-long-gun-registration-bill-republicans-walk-out" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/06/cadems-pass-gun-registration-gop-walks-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>71 Million Americans May Have Guns Registered</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/06/71-million-americans-may-have-guns-registered/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/06/71-million-americans-may-have-guns-registered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 01:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.30-06]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4473]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AK-47]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AR-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BATFE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confiscation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GCA1968]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N.M.Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NICS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=5343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you’re one of the nearly 71 million Americans who live in the four  southwest border states, some of your gun purchases could soon be  reported to the federal government. If you don’t like that—and no gun  owner should—read on, because this may be our first big head-on gun  control battle [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/usa.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3192" title="usa" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/usa.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>If you’re one of the nearly 71 million Americans who live in the four  southwest border states, some of your gun purchases could soon be  reported to the federal government. If you don’t like that—and no gun  owner should—read on, because this may be our first big head-on gun  control battle against the Obama administration.</p>
<p>he fight began with a bureaucratically worded “Emergency Notice of  Information Collection Under Review,” published in the Dec. 17 “Federal  Register”—the daily publication where all proposed federal rules make  their debut. It announced that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms  and Explosives plans to require federal firearms licensees in the border  states to begin reporting all transfers “of two or more rifles within  any five consecutive business days with the following characteristics:  (a) Semi automatic; (b) a caliber greater than .22; and (c) the ability  to accept a detachable magazine.”</p>
<p>In other words, a dealer would have to tell the government every time a  deer hunter in Sacramento or Amarillo finds a good deal on a pair of  semi-auto .30-06s like the popular Remington 7400.-[<a href="http://www.opposingviews.com/i/71-million-americans-may-have-to-report-gun-buys-to-feds" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/06/71-million-americans-may-have-guns-registered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U Of K Gun Owner Fired Over Gun In Car</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/05/uk-gun-owner-fired-over-gun-in-car/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/05/uk-gun-owner-fired-over-gun-in-car/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 21:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community of firearm owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitchell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=5261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The University of Kentucky  has fired a graduate student and former anesthesia technician, Michael  Mitchell, for keeping a gun in his car a mile away from the university  hospital where he was employed.</p>
<p>The university then proceeded to try to deny Mitchell unemployment  compensation by claiming, unsuccessfully, that he was fired for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3252" title="community" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>The University of Kentucky  has fired a graduate student and former anesthesia technician, Michael  Mitchell, for keeping a gun in his car a mile away from the university  hospital where he was employed.</p>
<p>The university then proceeded to try to deny Mitchell unemployment  compensation by claiming, unsuccessfully, that he was fired for  misconduct.  A hearing officer found against the University of Kentucky and in favor of Mitchell.</p>
<p>All this, despite the fact that Mitchell had a Kentucky concealed carry permit, believed he had fully complied with Kentucky law governing concealed carry, and therefore cooperated fully with police and university authorities.</p>
<p>And finally, Kentucky Revised Statutes sec. 27.020 seems to prevent a state institution like the University of Kentucky  from interfering with the Second Amendment rights of a concealed carry  permit holder.  That section holds, in part, that “[n]o person or  organization, public or private, shall prohibit” a concealed carry  permit holder from transporting a firearm in his vehicle in accordance  with law.</p>
<p>So&#8230;&#8230;.  What’s up with the University of Kentucky?</p>
<p>The answer is that it’s probably not much different from many  Left-leaning universities.  After all, Virginia Tech fought hard and  successfully to keep guns off its campus – nearly a year, to the day,  before a crazed gunman killed 31 people on that campus.-[<a href="http://gunowners.org/a04272011.htm" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/05/uk-gun-owner-fired-over-gun-in-car/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can We Prevent A Second Civil War?</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/04/can-we-prevent-a-second-civil-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/04/can-we-prevent-a-second-civil-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 02:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community of firearm owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3%ers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPFO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=5241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are three issues that could presently trigger a Civil War in America:</p>

 Illegal aliens. A government that refuses to protect  our borders, the methodical structure of citizenship, and the rule of  law, will only be tolerated for so long. America is reaching a tipping  point on this issue.


 Abortion. Irreconcilable differences [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3252" title="community" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>There are three issues that could presently trigger a Civil War in America:</p>
<ul>
<li> Illegal aliens. A government that refuses to protect  our borders, the methodical structure of citizenship, and the rule of  law, will only be tolerated for so long. America is reaching a tipping  point on this issue.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> Abortion. Irreconcilable differences here. This may likely become as potent an issue as slavery was in the 1860s.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> The right to keep and bear arms.</li>
</ul>
<p>No other significant present day problems could  potentially result in the “brother against brother” tragedy of a Second  American Civil War.</p>
<p>Sooner or later, the massive invasion of America by illegal  aliens will be confronted, if not by the rule of law then by either  armed police officers and soldiers … or armed citizens. There are twenty  million or more illegal aliens entrenched in this nation now. How many  tens of millions more will it take to reach a tipping point? At what  point will law enforcement agencies and/or the military begin to do the  job they were sworn to do? At what point will citizens themselves be  forced, by government inactivity, to confront this invasion by force of  arms?-[<a href="http://jpfo.org/kirby/kirby-2nd-civil-war.htm" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/04/can-we-prevent-a-second-civil-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop “McCarthyite” Gun Control</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/04/stop-%e2%80%9cmccarthyite%e2%80%9d-gun-control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/04/stop-%e2%80%9cmccarthyite%e2%80%9d-gun-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community of firearm owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1968GCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1992riots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4473]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christina Taylor Greene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gangs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H.R. 308]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HiCap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RKBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victims]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=5231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Like vultures, anti-gun congressmen are always picking the bones of some national tragedy looking for political advantage.</p>
<p>‏And the horrific shooting in Tucson earlier this year is just  another example, as a string of anti-gun bills have been introduced  recently. You may have seen a television ad about one of them: H.R. 308,  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3252" title="community" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>Like vultures, anti-gun congressmen are always picking the bones of some national tragedy looking for political advantage.</p>
<p>‏And the horrific shooting in Tucson earlier this year is just  another example, as a string of anti-gun bills have been introduced  recently. You may have seen a television ad about one of them: H.R. 308,  introduced by gun-hating Carolyn McCarthy less than two weeks after the  shooting, would ban so-called “high-capacity” magazines.‏</p>
<p>“I think when you think about just common sense here, large capacity  clips [sic] that can basically, in my opinion, be weapons of mass  destruction, should not be available to the average citizen,” McCarthy  said in an NPR interview.</p>
<p>‏But in virtually every way possible, Arizona shooter Jared Loughner is testimony to a generation of failed gun control.‏</p>
<p>Remember when, in 1968, we were told that if felons and other  undesirables were prohibited from having guns, gun crime would stop?  Well, Loughner was not a felon. Likewise, he was not an illegal,  military deserter, or a fugitive from justice.</p>
<p>‏Remember when, in 1993, we were assured that if gun purchasers were  “checked out” against an FBI database, gun crime would stop? Loughner  was checked out by the FBI; he passed.‏</p>
<p>Remember when, in 1999 after Columbine, we were told that if we  cracked down on gun shows, gun crime would stop? That crackdown didn’t  pass, but Loughner didn’t buy his gun at a gun show.</p>
<p>‏Remember when, after Virginia Tech, we were told that if we sent  more of Americans’ mental health records to the FBI’s secret list, gun  crime would stop? Loughner’s name wasn’t on the FBI expanded list  because he hadn’t been “adjudicated as a mental defective” or “committed  to a mental institution.”‏</p>
<p>Now we are told by McCarthy and her ilk that the solution to  tragedies like the one in Tucson consists of banning what are, in her  opinion, “high-capacity” magazines.-[<a href="http://gunowners.org/a04182011.htm" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2011/04/stop-%e2%80%9cmccarthyite%e2%80%9d-gun-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

