<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geeks With Guns &#187; Democrat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/tag/democrat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com</link>
	<description>This ain&#039;t your fathers&#039; 2nd Amendment website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:15:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>North Carolina Gov. Suspends Gun Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/09/north-carolina-gov-suspends-gun-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/09/north-carolina-gov-suspends-gun-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 03:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>State of emergency order makes criminals of concealed handgun permit-holders, sport shooters and hunters.</p>
<p>[Raleigh] Yesterday, North Carolina Governor Beverly Perdue signed Executive Order No. 62, declaring a State of Emergency in advance of Hurricane Earle. In doing so, Perdue suspended the right of state residents to use or carry firearms outside their premises.-[source]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3182" title="politics" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>State of emergency order makes criminals of concealed handgun permit-holders, sport shooters and hunters.</p>
<p>[Raleigh] Yesterday, North Carolina Governor Beverly Perdue signed Executive Order No. 62, declaring a State of Emergency in advance of Hurricane Earle. In doing so, Perdue suspended the right of state residents to use or carry firearms outside their premises.-[<a href="http://www.examiner.com/gun-rights-in-charlotte/north-carolina-governor-suspends-gun-rights" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/09/north-carolina-gov-suspends-gun-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NRA Mans Up To Harry Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/09/nra-mans-up-to-harry-reid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/09/nra-mans-up-to-harry-reid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 02:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community of firearm owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nugent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This week&#8217;s hostage standoff at the Discovery Channel headquarters in Maryland offers a scary reminder why it&#8217;s important for Americans to be able to own and carry firearms. When the public is packing heat, it&#8217;s more dangerous for deranged criminals to threaten innocent life because individuals can defend themselves. No organization does more to protect [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3252" title="community" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>This week&#8217;s hostage standoff at the Discovery Channel headquarters in Maryland offers a scary reminder why it&#8217;s important for Americans to be able to own and carry firearms. When the public is packing heat, it&#8217;s more dangerous for deranged criminals to threaten innocent life because individuals can defend themselves. No organization does more to protect our right to keep and bear arms than the National Rifle Association, and when you go against the NRA, you get thumped. Just ask Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.-[<a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/sep/2/nra-mans-up-to-harry-reid/" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/09/nra-mans-up-to-harry-reid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Political Victory For All Gun Owners</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/09/a-political-victory-for-all-gun-owners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/09/a-political-victory-for-all-gun-owners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NICS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A shining moment for California’s Gun owners who flexed their collective power and made their voices heard!</p>
<p>DEFEATED:</p>

 AB 1810(Feuer) – Registration of Rifles and Shotguns
AB 1934 (Saldana) – Handgun Open Carry Prohibition
AB 2358 (De Leon) – Ammunition Registration

<p>All three of these bills posed a fundamental threat to the rights of  gun owners. And there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3182" title="politics" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>A shining moment for California’s Gun owners who flexed their collective power and made their voices heard!</em></p>
<p><strong>DEFEATED:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> AB 1810(Feuer) – Registration of Rifles and Shotguns</li>
<li>AB 1934 (Saldana) – Handgun Open Carry Prohibition</li>
<li>AB 2358 (De Leon) – Ammunition Registration</li>
</ul>
<p>All three of these bills posed a fundamental threat to the rights of  gun owners. And there was no room for compromise any one of the bills.</p>
<p>It was a fight down to midnight, but in the late hours of August 31, AB 1810, AB 1934, and AB 2358 were DEFEATED!</p>
<p>This is a huge win for gun owners.  Thank you to all members who took  time to contact members of legislature and voice their strong  opposition to these bills.  Your collective voice was heard loud and  clear at the capitol.  You stoked the fire against AB 1810, AB 1934, and  AB 2358 and it paid off!-[<a href="http://www.ammoland.com/2010/09/01/a-political-victory-for-all-gun-owners/" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/09/a-political-victory-for-all-gun-owners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Senate Rejects Open-Carry Gun Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/california-senate-rejects-open-carry-gun-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/california-senate-rejects-open-carry-gun-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The California Senate  rejected a bill Monday that would have made it illegal to carry unloaded  guns in public, but lawmakers will give the vote one more try.</p>
<p>Monday&#8217;s 20-16 vote fell one short of the majority needed, but the Senate will reconsider the measure Tuesday.</p>
<p>The  bill, AB1934, was introduced after a series [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3182" title="politics" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>The California Senate  rejected a bill Monday that would have made it illegal to carry unloaded  guns in public, but lawmakers will give the vote one more try.</p>
<p>Monday&#8217;s 20-16 vote fell one short of the majority needed, but the Senate will reconsider the measure Tuesday.</p>
<p>The  bill, AB1934, was introduced after a series of demonstrations by  gun-rights organizations during which they encouraged participants to  openly carry unloaded weapons. California law lets gun owners carry a  rifle or handgun in a holster if it is not loaded.</p>
<p>The legislation would make it a misdemeanor to openly carry a handgun in any public place.-[<a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_15945772?nclick_check=1" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/california-senate-rejects-open-carry-gun-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movement On The U.N. Gun Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/movement-on-the-u-n-gun-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/movement-on-the-u-n-gun-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and the United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AR-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RKBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.N.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mexican President and Chicago Mayor call for end of U.S. Sovereignty.</p>
<p>A storm of liberal anti-gun opinion is swelling to force international  anti-gun policies on American citizens as NAGR continues the fight to  protect the Second Amendment from international gun grabbers.</p>
<p>Recently we reported that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama Administration are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/foreign_policy.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3169" title="foreign_policy" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/foreign_policy.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>Mexican President and Chicago Mayor call for end of U.S. Sovereignty.</em></p>
<p>A storm of liberal anti-gun opinion is swelling to force international  anti-gun policies on American citizens as NAGR continues the fight to  protect the Second Amendment from international gun grabbers.</p>
<p>Recently we reported that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama Administration are pushing for Senate ratification of the United Nations&#8217; <em>“Small Arms Treaty.” </em>The  National Association for Gun Rights has taken the lead on stopping this  end-run around the Constitution by contacting millions of Americans  about this impending threat to their liberties, and working with  principled leaders in Washington, D.C. to build a bulwark against the  treaty.-[<a href="http://www.ammoland.com/2010/08/26/un-gun-ban/" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/movement-on-the-u-n-gun-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Lawmakers In Chicago To Push Gun Control</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/national-lawmakers-in-chicago-to-push-gun-control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/national-lawmakers-in-chicago-to-push-gun-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 22:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gunshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NICS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>National lawmakers were in Chicago holding a Congressional hearing on proposed gun control legislation today.</p>
<p>The  Closing the Gun Show Loophole Act would require private sellers at gun  shows to perform background checks before selling firearms. Illinois  passed a similar law in 2005.-[source]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3182" title="politics" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>National lawmakers were in Chicago holding a Congressional hearing on proposed gun control legislation today.</strong></p>
<p>The  Closing the Gun Show Loophole Act would require private sellers at gun  shows to perform background checks before selling firearms. Illinois  passed a similar law in 2005.-[<a href="http://www.wbez.org/Content.aspx?audioID=43910" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/national-lawmakers-in-chicago-to-push-gun-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California &#8211; Democrat Gun Ban Vote Postponed!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/california-democrat-gun-ban-vote-postponed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/california-democrat-gun-ban-vote-postponed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 21:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>AB 1934 would ban the Open Carry of unloaded handguns throughout the  State of California. Although the handgun must be unloaded it is legal  to carry ammunition with you and, with a little practice, have the gun  loaded and aimed in less than two seconds. There are some restrictions  however. It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3182" title="politics" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>AB 1934 would ban the Open Carry of unloaded handguns throughout the  State of California. Although the handgun must be unloaded it is legal  to carry ammunition with you and, with a little practice, have the gun  loaded and aimed in less than two seconds. There are some restrictions  however. It is illegal to walk along a public sidewalk or across a  public street within 1,000 feet of the grounds of a K-12 public or  private school. It is legal to openly carry at a business, residence or  private property (so long as the private property doesn&#8217;t have a  sidewalk with a public easement). Step one foot onto the public  sidewalk, or any government property, and you face serious jail time.-[<a href="http://www.examiner.com/la-in-los-angeles/california-democrat-gun-ban-vote-postponed-ab1934" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/california-democrat-gun-ban-vote-postponed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gun Show Bill A De-Facto Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/gun-show-bill-a-de-facto-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/gun-show-bill-a-de-facto-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gunshows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rabidly anti-gun Congressman Mike Quigley (IL-5) will be holding a  public hearing on a bill he has co-sponsored that would put gun shows  under the supervision of the federal government.</p>
<p>The bill, HR 2324, would subject gun show hosts to a slew of  pointless, time consuming regulations in addition to heaping all sorts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3182" title="politics" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>Rabidly anti-gun Congressman Mike Quigley (IL-5) will be holding a  public hearing on a bill he has co-sponsored that would put gun shows  under the supervision of the federal government.</p>
<p>The bill, HR 2324, would subject gun show hosts to a slew of  pointless, time consuming regulations in addition to heaping all sorts  of red tape and record keeping requirements on gun show hosts and  participants.</p>
<blockquote><p>The ultimate goal of Quigley’s bill is to make hosting a  gun show too much of a hassle to endure. As a result, this bill would  quickly make gun shows disappear all together.</p></blockquote>
<p>It should be noted that Congressman Mark Kirk (IL-10) is another co-sponsor of this slap to the face of the 2nd Amendment.-[<a href="http://www.ammoland.com/2010/08/17/anti-gun-mike-quigley-advocating-clamp-down-on-gun-shows/" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/gun-show-bill-a-de-facto-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gunowners:Expect The Worst From Lame-Duck Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/gunownersexpect-the-worst-from-lame-duck-congress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/gunownersexpect-the-worst-from-lame-duck-congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 01:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AR-15]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BATFE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confiscation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gunshows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JPFO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NICS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.N.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>President Obama has recently dropped his cagey and coy dissembling about his true “gun control” plans. In July of this year he once again made it completely clear that he was in favor of a renewed &#8220;assault weapon&#8221; ban. </p>
<p>Obama is no longer laying low on the issue. We also know where Obama’s socialist Supreme Court [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3182" title="politics" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>President Obama has recently dropped his cagey and coy dissembling about his true “gun control” plans. In July of this year he once again made it completely clear that he was in favor of a renewed &#8220;assault weapon&#8221; ban. </p>
<p>Obama is no longer laying low on the issue. We also know where Obama’s socialist Supreme Court appointees Sotomayer (who voted against the McDonald decision), and almost certainly Kagan, stand on citizens owning firearms. Kagan is just another Sotomayer when it comes to 2A. Like Sotomayer, she waffled and said all the right things to gain her confirmation by the Senate. Do you really think Kagan would have voted in favor of Heller or McDonald?</p>
<p>No, who can now seriously doubt that Obama, and those who he’s appointed, are not deeply ingrained enemies of the Second Amendment?</p>
<p>Why this recent renewal of Obama’s true agenda? Up until now Obama knew that he did not have the votes in Congress to pass anti-gun legislation. “Gun control” is, at this time, a political non-starter. So he temporarily put on his sheep’s clothing and played the “moderate” on gun rights. This has well suited his actual wider purpose.</p>
<p>With an anticipated lame-duck session of Congress after the November elections, Obama’s strategy is certain to surface. In many ways it will be a “now or never” opportunity for him. It will also be a last gasp chance at bitter revenge from liberal anti-gun politicians who will have been rejected by an angry November electorate.-[<a href="http://www.jpfo.org/articles-assd02/lame-ducks-and-guns.htm" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/gunownersexpect-the-worst-from-lame-duck-congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CA Ready To Ban Open Carry;Register Long Guns</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/ca-ready-to-ban-open-carryregister-long-guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/ca-ready-to-ban-open-carryregister-long-guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weaponry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concealed carry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shotgun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>AB 1810 RIFLE AND SHOTGUN REGISTRATION
AB 1810 SUMMARY: Applies the same regulations relating to the reporting and retention of records for handguns to long guns, as specified. Specifically, this bill conforms reporting and record retention provisions in order that transfers and information reporting and retention requirements for handguns and firearms other than handguns are the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/weapons.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3193" title="weapons" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/weapons.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>AB 1810 RIFLE AND SHOTGUN REGISTRATION</strong><br />
AB 1810 SUMMARY: Applies the same regulations relating to the reporting and retention of records for handguns to long guns, as specified. Specifically, this bill conforms reporting and record retention provisions in order that transfers and information reporting and retention requirements for handguns and firearms other than handguns are the same.</p>
<p>AB 1810 requires registration of rifles and shotguns in the same way handguns are now registered in California. Under current law, the information collected at the time of purchase of a rifle or shotgun<em> (serial number, make, and model) </em>is destroyed after the background check is completed. AB 1810 will require that the make, model, and serial number of the firearm, as well as the identifying information of the purchaser, be recorded and kept on file by the California Attorney General’s office. AB 1810 will also impose additional costs on firearms owners to maintain the registration system as well as on the state’s licensed firearms dealers and small businesses who already deal with extensive recordkeeping requirements</p>
<p>Assembly Member Feuer, the author of AB 1810, claims that the registration of rifles and shotguns will help law enforcement track down criminals and persons prohibited from owning firearms. This logic is flawed. Studies have shown that violent criminals steal firearms to commit crimes and of course they do not comply with current law by registering their stolen handguns.</p>
<blockquote><p>It is already against the law to possess a stolen firearm or to possess any firearm if you are prohibited from possessing a firearm by law. And most criminals file off the serial numbers on guns used in crimes. In truth, the only persons impacted by this unnecessary proposed law are law abiding citizens.-[<a href="http://www.ammoland.com/2010/08/16/california-banning-open-carry-registering-all-long-guns/" target="_blank">source</a>]</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/ca-ready-to-ban-open-carryregister-long-guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
