<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geeks With Guns &#187; Federal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/tag/federal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com</link>
	<description>This ain&#039;t your fathers&#039; 2nd Amendment website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:15:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FED SUIT END WONT AFFECT SAF/SEATTLE SUIT</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/09/fed-suit-end-wont-affect-saf-win-vs-seattle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/09/fed-suit-end-wont-affect-saf-win-vs-seattle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community of firearm owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1968GCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCRKBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gottlieb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Thursday’s announcement by a Kent, WA attorney that he has ended his federal lawsuit against the City of Seattle’s parks gun ban does not affect the on-going state-court case filed jointly by the Second Amendment Foundation and National Rifle Association.</p>
<p>SAF Executive Vice President Alan Gottlieb noted Friday morning that there has been some confusion about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3252" title="community" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>Thursday’s announcement by a Kent, WA attorney that he has ended his federal lawsuit against the City of Seattle’s parks gun ban does not affect the on-going state-court case filed jointly by the Second Amendment Foundation and National Rifle Association.</p>
<p>SAF Executive Vice President Alan Gottlieb noted Friday morning that there has been some confusion about the two cases. SAF and NRA were joined by the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, the Washington Arms Collectors and five individual plaintiffs in their lawsuit, which found the city’s parks gun ban to be in violation of state law. That case has been appealed by the city.</p>
<p>“The federal case, as plaintiff Bob Warden noted in his statement, has never been connected to our case,” Gottlieb clarified. “The SAF/NRA case, which was filed first and has already won in King County Superior Court, remains very much alive and we are confident that we will prevail in the state court of appeals. -[<a href="http://www.saf.org/viewpr-new.asp?id=342" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/09/fed-suit-end-wont-affect-saf-win-vs-seattle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Denial On Lead Hunting Ammunition Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/epa-denial-on-lead-hunting-ammunition-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/epa-denial-on-lead-hunting-ammunition-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Considerations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Center for Biological Diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxic Substances Control Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSCA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Facing strong opposition from U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe and others, a key federal agency denied a petition Friday seeking a ban on lead ammunition used by hunters.</p>
<p>The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, however, said it would continue to review another section of the petition on the use of lead in fishing tackle.</p>
<p>In denying the request on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/environment.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3168" title="environment" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/environment.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>Facing strong opposition from U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe and others, a key federal agency denied a petition Friday seeking a ban on lead ammunition used by hunters.</p>
<p>The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, however, said it would continue to review another section of the petition on the use of lead in fishing tackle.</p>
<p>In denying the request on banning lead ammunition, EPA said the Toxic Substances Control Act does not give the agency the authority needed to address that issue. -[<a href="http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?subjectid=12&amp;articleid=20100827_12_0_WASHIN629731" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/epa-denial-on-lead-hunting-ammunition-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Attempt to Ban Firearm Sales</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/federal-attempt-to-ban-firearm-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/federal-attempt-to-ban-firearm-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4473]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BATFE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gunshows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NICS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RKBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The rush is on to ban private firearm sales at gun shows under the guise of referring to these sales as a “loophole.”</p>
<p>Federal law does not currently restrict private firearm transfers  between law-abiding citizens whether they take place at home or at a gun  show, and NAGR is taking a stand to keep [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3182" title="politics" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>The rush is on to ban private firearm sales at gun shows under the guise of referring to these sales as a <em>“loophole.”</em></p>
<p>Federal law does not currently restrict private firearm transfers  between law-abiding citizens whether they take place at home or at a gun  show, and NAGR is taking a stand to keep it that way.</p>
<p>As you no doubt already know, Michael Bloomberg and his millionaire  cronies are pouring their money into a media blitz through their  anti-Second Amendment group, <strong>Mayor’s Against Illegal Guns.</strong>-[<a href="http://www.ammoland.com/2010/08/25/federal-attempt-to-ban-firearm-sales/" target="_blank">source</a>]<strong> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/federal-attempt-to-ban-firearm-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Considering Ban on Traditional Ammunition</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/epa-considering-ban-on-traditional-ammunition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/epa-considering-ban-on-traditional-ammunition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental Considerations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSSF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>With the fall hunting season fast approaching, the Environmental  Protection Agency (EPA) under Lisa Jackson, who was responsible for  banning bear hunting in New Jersey, is now considering a petition by the  Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) – a leading anti-hunting  organization – to ban all traditional ammunition under the Toxic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/environment.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3168" title="environment" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/environment.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>With the fall hunting season fast approaching, the Environmental  Protection Agency (EPA) under Lisa Jackson, who was responsible for  banning bear hunting in New Jersey, is now considering a petition by the  Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) – a leading anti-hunting  organization – to ban all traditional ammunition under the Toxic  Substance Control Act of 1976, a law in which Congress expressly  exempted ammunition.  If the EPA approves the petition, the result will  be a total ban on all ammunition containing lead-core components,  including hunting and target-shooting rounds. The EPA must decide to  accept or reject this petition by November 1, 2010, the day before the  midterm elections.-[<a href="http://www.nssfblog.com/epa-considering-ban-on-traditional-ammunition-take-action-now/" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/epa-considering-ban-on-traditional-ammunition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LI GROUP GIVES SAF $2K FOR LAWSUIT HELP</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/li-group-gives-saf-2k-for-lawsuit-help/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/li-group-gives-saf-2k-for-lawsuit-help/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 02:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community of firearm owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gottlieb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RKBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Long Island Firearms has contributed $2,000 to the Second Amendment  Foundation to support its legal actions, including a lawsuit in  Westchester County challenging a state law that allows carry licenses to  be denied because applicants cannot show “good cause.”</p>
<p>This  is the second such contribution from a New York group. Earlier, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3252" title="community" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>Long Island Firearms has contributed $2,000 to the Second Amendment  Foundation to support its legal actions, including a lawsuit in  Westchester County challenging a state law that allows carry licenses to  be denied because applicants cannot show “good cause.”</p>
<p>This  is the second such contribution from a New York group. Earlier, the  Shooters Committee On Political Education (SCOPE) contributed to the SAF  legal action effort.</p>
<p>“SAF is very grateful for this level  of support from Long Island Firearms,” said SAF Executive Vice President  Alan M. Gottlieb. “The level of support we are getting from New York  gun owners clearly demonstrates their dedication to correcting the  Empire State’s onerous gun laws. For far too long, officials in the  Empire State have treated the Second Amendment right to keep and bear  arms as a highly-regulated privilege. It is time for that to end.”-[<a href="http://www.saf.org/viewpr-new.asp?id=339" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/li-group-gives-saf-2k-for-lawsuit-help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Lawmakers In Chicago To Push Gun Control</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/national-lawmakers-in-chicago-to-push-gun-control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/national-lawmakers-in-chicago-to-push-gun-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 22:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gunshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NICS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>National lawmakers were in Chicago holding a Congressional hearing on proposed gun control legislation today.</p>
<p>The  Closing the Gun Show Loophole Act would require private sellers at gun  shows to perform background checks before selling firearms. Illinois  passed a similar law in 2005.-[source]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3182" title="politics" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>National lawmakers were in Chicago holding a Congressional hearing on proposed gun control legislation today.</strong></p>
<p>The  Closing the Gun Show Loophole Act would require private sellers at gun  shows to perform background checks before selling firearms. Illinois  passed a similar law in 2005.-[<a href="http://www.wbez.org/Content.aspx?audioID=43910" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/national-lawmakers-in-chicago-to-push-gun-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gun Show Bill A De-Facto Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/gun-show-bill-a-de-facto-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/gun-show-bill-a-de-facto-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gunshows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Rabidly anti-gun Congressman Mike Quigley (IL-5) will be holding a  public hearing on a bill he has co-sponsored that would put gun shows  under the supervision of the federal government.</p>
<p>The bill, HR 2324, would subject gun show hosts to a slew of  pointless, time consuming regulations in addition to heaping all sorts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3182" title="politics" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/politics.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>Rabidly anti-gun Congressman Mike Quigley (IL-5) will be holding a  public hearing on a bill he has co-sponsored that would put gun shows  under the supervision of the federal government.</p>
<p>The bill, HR 2324, would subject gun show hosts to a slew of  pointless, time consuming regulations in addition to heaping all sorts  of red tape and record keeping requirements on gun show hosts and  participants.</p>
<blockquote><p>The ultimate goal of Quigley’s bill is to make hosting a  gun show too much of a hassle to endure. As a result, this bill would  quickly make gun shows disappear all together.</p></blockquote>
<p>It should be noted that Congressman Mark Kirk (IL-10) is another co-sponsor of this slap to the face of the 2nd Amendment.-[<a href="http://www.ammoland.com/2010/08/17/anti-gun-mike-quigley-advocating-clamp-down-on-gun-shows/" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/gun-show-bill-a-de-facto-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SAF SUES CHICAGO OVER RANGE ON 1A, 2A GROUNDS</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/saf-sues-chicago-over-range-on-1a-2a-grounds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/saf-sues-chicago-over-range-on-1a-2a-grounds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 03:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community of firearm owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ezell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gottlieb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hespen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pistol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tyranny]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) today filed a lawsuit in federal court against the City of Chicago’s new gun ordinance, asserting that “by banning gun ranges open to the public…under color of law,” the city is depriving citizens of their right to keep and bear arms in violation of the Second Amendment to the U.S. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3252" title="community" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) today filed a lawsuit in federal court against the City of Chicago’s new gun ordinance, asserting that “by banning gun ranges open to the public…under color of law,” the city is depriving citizens of their right to keep and bear arms in violation of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.</p>
<p>Joining SAF in this lawsuit are the Illinois State Rifle Association (ISRA), Action Target, Inc., and three individual plaintiffs including a retired Chicago police detective. They are represented by attorneys Alan Gura of Virginia and David Sigale of Chicago, who teamed up with SAF and ISRA on the landmark case of McDonald v. City of Chicago, which incorporated the Second Amendment to the states, effectively striking down Chicago’s 28-year-old handgun ban.</p>
<p>“While the city has adopted new regulations that make it legal to own handguns,” said SAF Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb, “they have crafted this new ordinance to make it virtually impossible for prospective gun owners to meet all legal requirements unless they travel outside the city for mandatory training. The new ordinance prohibits public gun ranges inside the city yet the city demands that handgun owners get at least one hour of range training time.</p>
<p>“This is a ‘Catch-22’ scenario,” he continued, “that seems deliberately designed to discourage Chicago residents from exercising their firearm civil rights barely two months after those rights were restored by the Supreme Court.”-[<a href="http://www.saf.org/viewpr-new.asp?id=337" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/08/saf-sues-chicago-over-range-on-1a-2a-grounds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Suit Over Nevada&#8217;s State Parks Gun Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/07/federal-suit-against-nevadas-state-parks-gun-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/07/federal-suit-against-nevadas-state-parks-gun-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community of firearm owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RKBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=4082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A Colorado legal foundation has filed a federal lawsuit challenging Nevada&#8217;s law that generally bans the possession of loaded guns in state parks.</p>
<p>Attorneys for the Mountain States Legal Foundation in Denver, along with Elko attorney Robert Salyer, filed suit in U.S. District Court for Nevada this week in behalf of Al Baker, an Idaho outdoorsman [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3252" title="community" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>A Colorado legal foundation has filed a federal lawsuit challenging Nevada&#8217;s law that generally bans the possession of loaded guns in state parks.</p>
<p>Attorneys for the Mountain States Legal Foundation in Denver, along with Elko attorney Robert Salyer, filed suit in U.S. District Court for Nevada this week in behalf of Al Baker, an Idaho outdoorsman who said he was threatened with six months&#8217; jail time if he fired his gun in Nevada state parks &#8212; even in self defense.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Supreme Court’s ruling that the Second Amendment applies to the states via the 14th Amendment makes it clear that the Nevada law is unconstitutional and must be stricken,&#8221; William Perry Pendley, president of the Mountain States Legal Foundation, said in a statement announcing the lawsuit.</p>
<p>A spokesman for the Nevada Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, parent agency of the Nevada Division of State Parks, said the agency hadn&#8217;t seen the suit and had no immediate comment on it. State parks in the Las Vegas area are the Valley of Fire, Spring Mountain Ranch and Old Las Vegas Mormon Fort.</p>
<p>The Mountain States Legal Foundations says it is a nonprofit, public interest law firm dedicated to individual liberty, the right to own and use property, limited and ethical government and economic freedom.</p>
<p>In announcing the Idaho lawsuit, Pendley cited the U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s June 28 ruling striking down a Chicago ordinance banning handgun ownership and finding &#8220;the right to keep and bear arms [is] among those fundamental rights necessary to our system of ordered liberty.&#8221;-[<a href="http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/jul/16/federal-suit-filed-over-nevada-gun-ban-state-parks/" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/07/federal-suit-against-nevadas-state-parks-gun-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NRA Opposes Kagan</title>
		<link>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/07/nra-opposes-kagan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/07/nra-opposes-kagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 17:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>donttreadonme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community of firearm owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to keep and bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firearms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gun owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RKBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekswithguns.com/?p=3981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There may be no vote a United States Senator casts that is more important than a vote to confirm a nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court.  Now that the Court has clearly stated that the Second Amendment is a fundamental, individual right that applies to all law-abiding Americans, NRA members and gun owners expect a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3252" title="community" src="http://www.geekswithguns.com/wp-content/community.gif" alt="" width="69" height="66" /></a>There may be no vote a United States Senator casts that is more important than a vote to confirm a nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court.  Now that the Court has clearly stated that the Second Amendment is a fundamental, individual right that applies to all law-abiding Americans, NRA members and gun owners expect a nominee to the Court to fully support, defend and preserve that freedom.</p>
<p>We have carefully examined the career, written documents and public statements of nominee Elena Kagan and have found nothing to indicate any support for the Second Amendment.  On the contrary, the facts reveal a nominee who opposes Second Amendment rights and is clearly out of step with mainstream Americans.</p>
<p>Therefore, the NRA is strongly opposed to Kagan’s confirmation to the Court.-[<a href="http://www.nraila.org/News/Read/NewsReleases.aspx?ID=13980" target="_blank">source</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geekswithguns.com/2010/07/nra-opposes-kagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
