"I have a straightforward question, medications which I hope you will answer in a
straightforward way: Is it your intention to censor talk radio through
a variety of contrivances, website like this such as "local content, ailment " "diversity of
ownership," and "public interest" rules — all of which are designed to
appeal to populist sentiments but, as you know, are the death knell of
talk radio and the AM band?
You have singled me out directly, admonishing members of Congress
not to listen to my show. Bill Clinton has since chimed in, complaining
about the lack of balance on radio. And a number of members of your
party, in and out of Congress, are forming a chorus of advocates for
government control over radio content. This is both chilling and
ominous."
Read more…
After the Federal Communications Commission abandoned the Fairness
Doctrine in the mid-1980s, Congress passed legislation to reinstitute
it. When President Reagan vetoed it, he declared that "This doctrine .
. . requires Federal officials to supervise the editorial practices of
broadcasters in an effort to ensure that they provide coverage of
controversial issues and a reasonable opportunity for the airing of
contrasting viewpoints of those issues. This type of content-based
regulation by the Federal Government is . . . antagonistic to the
freedom of expression guaranteed by the First Amendment. . . . History
has shown that the dangers of an overly timid or biased press cannot be
averted through bureaucratic regulation, but only through the freedom
and competition that the First Amendment sought to guarantee."
Read full transcript @ http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123508978035028163.html
.Com Chatter