Yeah that’s right, two-hundred and fifty years too late, but the Supreme Court has finally understood what the Fourth Amendment states,
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
It seems that during the Klinton Administration the President himself felt that warrantless searches was reasonable, especially during domestic violence disputes.
Go figure Billy, make it impossible for a woman to defend herself, then when the police are thrown into the equation, a warrant is unnecessary for the search of the premises, for anything the state may not agree with or consider questionable. Maybe then make an arrest while waiting for a warrant to be issued for the questionable property to be confiscated.
After all, noone ever beat on a .38……
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060323/NEWS07/603230554/1001/NEWS
http://www.flexyourrights.org/
http://home.earthlink.net/~kstengel226/civ_lib/spy/index.html
.Com Chatter